Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:21

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
When writing a novel, how can a character be developed well, but QUICKLY?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why should we share our wife with others?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Reality TV star’s son dead at 16: ‘Life is so cruel and unfair’ - AL.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Samsung sponsored runs hint at Galaxy Unpacked in New York City - SamMobile
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Hi booktokers! What are we currently reading? 😊📖
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How did you respond to, "Why do you love me"?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Boeing Stock, Up 64% From April Low, Upgraded To Buy As Trump Game Piece - Investor's Business Daily